Published July, 2014
Matter of Anthony (Board of Immigration Appeals 2014): Brief of The Center for HIV Law and Policy, Lambda Legal and Immigration Equality
The Center for HIV Law and Policy joined with Lambda Legal and Immigration Equality in filing this friend-of-the-court brief in Matter of Anthony (a pseudonym) seeking to reverse an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying immigration protection and relief to Anthony, a gay man who is at risk of being tortured and persecuted based on his sexual orientation if he is forcibly deported to Jamaica.
In denying relief, the judge concluded that if Anthony is deported to Jamaica he could avoid persecution and torture by closeting himself and hiding his sexual orientation. CHLP, Lambda Legal and Immigration Equality argue that forcibly deporting Anthony to a country where his survival will depend on his ability to conceal his sexual orientation is a violation not only of his right to live in accordance with his conscience, but also of well-established principles of U.S. immigration law. It would force Anthony to deny a fundamental part of his identity to avoid torture, a requirement that has not been imposed on people who have sought protection based on their religious or political beliefs. To do so would make the U.S. government complicit in Anthony’s torture. Numerous other courts have held that asylum seekers are not required to change immutable characteristics or to abandon their beliefs simply to avoid future persecution.
CHLP filed a similar brief in an earlier, successful appeal in this same case in August 2013. At that time, the Board of Immigration Appeals reversed the IJ and remanded the case for further proceedings but for a second time the IJ denied Anthony’s application for immigration protection.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.