Published September, 2014
California Governor Signs Law Requiring Prosecutors to Petition Courts for Permission to Use Condoms as Evidence of Prostitution (2014)
On September 18, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 336 into law. The bill, authored by San Francisco Assembly Member Tom Ammiano, requires prosecutors who want to use the possession of one or more condoms as evidence of prostitution or loitering with intent to commit prostitution to submit a motion to the court and the defense stating there is proof that the condoms are relevant as well as a sealed affidavit to the court stating what that proof is.
While the law is not an outright ban on the use of condoms as evidence of prostitution, supporters of the bill say it creates a de facto ban by mandat- ing a process that prosecutors will be unlikely to pursue.
The use of condoms as evidence of prostitution is in direct conflict with public health policy that encourages condom use. Studies have shown that many sex workers decide not to carry condoms out of fear of arrest, putting themselves and their clients at risk of contracting HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. And police have often used the possession of condoms as the sole justification for arrests, especially of transgender women.
In 2013 prosecutors in Brooklyn, NY and San Francisco, CA announced that they will no longer use condoms as evidence in prostitution cases. In May 2014, New York City Police Commission William Bratton announced that the NYPD would no longer use condoms as evidence in certain prostitution arrests.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.