Published June, 2016
Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006-2013, Laura Duberstein Lindberg, et al, Journal of Adolescent Health (2016)
Following studies in the 1990s and early 2000s which found serious gaps in the sex education of minors, national public health organizations called for increased sex education from schools and parents. This article analyzes changes made in sex education from 2006 to 2013 according to the National Surveys of Family Growth, which focused on “how to say no to sex,” “methods of birth control,” “sexually transmitted diseases,” “how to prevent HIV/AIDS,” “waiting until marriage to have sex,” “where to get birth control,” and “how to use a condom”
Although many of the adolescents surveyed had received formal instruction on abstinence before marriage, there were declines in the number of teens receiving instruction about methods of birth control, sexually transmitted disease, and saying no to sex. For many study participants, sex education began after their first sex. Declines in sex education were especially common in nonmetropolitan areas, where teenagers also reported higher-than-average instances of pregnancy, lower rates of contraceptive use, and restricted access to sexual and reproductive health care services.
Despite the decline in sex education, reliance on contraceptives by teenagers has been increasing. The authors hypothesize that the internet may be providing a source for comprehensive sex education for teenagers, relying on past studies finding 92% of adolescents use the internet once a day, while 55% reported using the internet to look up health information. Since the quality of online sex education might be lacking, the authors suggest this possibility be explored in future research.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.