Published January, 2012
E.E.O.C. v. Summer Classics, Inc., 471 F. App'x 868, 869 (11th Cir. 2012)
This is an United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit decision affirming the federal district court's decision to grant summary judgment to the employer in a lawsuit alleging wrongful termination of an HIV-positive employee under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The district court granted summary judgment to the employer on the ground that the plaintiff, Mr. Lowe, failed to file his complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of the adverse employment action, as required by the EEOC. The EEOC also argued that Mr. Lowe's July 2007 intake questionnaire and handwritten note constituted a sufficient charge of discrimination and should be used to determine compliance with its 180-day limitation period. The court disagreed, relying on a United States Supreme Court decision that sets forth what constitutes sufficient notice of a claim. Fed. Exp. Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. 389, 128 S. Ct. 1147, 170 L. Ed. 2d 10 (2008).
While this case focuses primarily on a procedural issue, it provides guidance for employees alleging employment discrimination on the basis of their HIV, namely that the timeliness and formality of requests to the EEOC to take formal action are crucial.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.