Published June, 2013
HIV Risk Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Who Have Experienced Childhood Sexual Abuse: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Shane Lloyd and Don Operario, AIDS Education and Prevention (2012)
This article summarizes a review of all available United States studies assessing the childhood sexual abuse (CSA) history and risk-taking behavior (along with STI/HIV related outcomes) of men who have sex with men (MSM). Researchers found a correlation between HIV infection and a history of CSA among MSM. While the rate of HIV positive MSM with no history of CSA was 10.8%, the corresponding percentage for MSM who had been abused was 13.1%.
There are many hypotheses about why MSM with CSA history are more vulnerable to HIV. Some researchers think the correlation is related to the "anxiety, hostility, and suicidality, which can then contribute to unsafe sexual behaviors" experienced by many victims of abuse. Others point to the fact that CSA often causes victims to feel less empowered when negotiating their sexual safety later in life. Another theory is that early sexual abuse directly correlates to behaviors that are linked to higher rates of HIV, such as substance abuse and sexual risk taking.
The researchers conclude that additional research is necessary to understand exactly how CSA relates to HIV rates in adulthood. They suggest that instead of focusing solely on physical health care, HIV prevention programs should also incorporate mental health components. The overlap between CSA and HIV also indicates that psychological health care providers should be trained in HIV prevention and treatment.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.