Published June, 2009
Letter to the American Medical Association House of Delegates Regarding Proposed Resolution 517 for Mandatory Testing of Pregnant Women, The Center for HIV Law and Policy et al. (2009)
This letter, authored by CHLP and joined by seventeen other organizations, opposes a proposed AMA resolution calling for mandatory testing of pregnant women (Resolution 517). The letter cites evidence that informed consent is not a barrier to care and, in fact, states that have preserved written informed consent have virtually eliminated perinatal HIV transmission. It also presents evidence of several successful models incorporating informed consent into health care. The letter argues that it is, in fact, health care providers’ failure to offer a test, rather than informed consent, that remains a barrier to eliminating mother-to-child transmission. It also notes that respected medical authorities such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Public Health Service Task Force Perinatal Guidelines Working Group all oppose mandatory testing of pregnant women.
Resolution 517 was not passed, but was sent to the AMA’s Ethics Committee, which is compiling a report on the proposal scheduled to be released in June 2010. Organizations wishing to submit reports, letters, or research opposing the Resolution should contact
Bette-Jane Crigger, PhD
Director, Ethics Policy
Secretary, Council on Ethical & Judicial Affairs
American Medical Association
515 N. State Street
Chicago IL 60654
[email protected]
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.