Published April, 2013

In the Matter of Ramirez, Brief for Amici Curiae, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review, Board of Immigration Appeals, Lambda Legal and HIV Law Project (2013)

Pleadings and Briefs
Related issues
Immigration

This Amici Curiae brief, filed by Lambda Legal and the HIV Law Project, addresses an Immigration Judge's (IJ) order to deport an HIV positive California man, Jose Luis Ramirez, back to Mexico. Based on misconceptions about HIV, the IJ found that because Mr. Ramirez had been convicted for solicitation for oral sex while he was HIV positive, he had committed a "particularly serious crime."

Files
ramirez_ca_20130409_amicus.pdf (4.25 MB)
Related Content
Resource

Matter of Anthony (Board of Immigration Appeals 2013)

October 29, 2013
Resource

Matter of Anthony (Board of Immigration Appeals 2013): Brief of The Center for HIV Law and Policy, Lambda Legal, International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, the National Assoc of Social Workers; the National Assoc of Social Workers, CT Chapter

August 20, 2013
Resource

Matter of Lopez (Board of Immigration Appeals 2013)

August 16, 2013
Resource

Lopez Berera v. Holder, Brief of Amici Curiae, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Lambda Legal and Winston & Strawn LLP (2013)

August 13, 2013
Resource

In the Matter of Lopez-Roque, Request To Appear As Amici Curiae And Brief Of The Center For HIV Law And Policy, National Alliance Of State And Territorial AIDS Directors, The HIV Medicine Assoc., The Assoc. Of Nurses In AIDS Care, And Bienestar (2013)

July 10, 2013

Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.

Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.