Published October, 2015
Moving Beyond Biomedicalization in the HIV Response: Implications for Community Involvement and Community Leadership Among Men who have Sex with Men and Transgender People, Peter Aggleton & Richard Parker, American Journal of Public Health (2015)
Despite biomedical advances in the fight against HIV, Aggleton and Parker argue, many socially excluded groups continue to face disproportionately high transmission rates, as well as stigma, discrimination, and violence. They see this failure as a result of the increasing “biomedicalization” of the movement, leading to a narrowing in the understanding of expertise and a diminished regard for important social factors. For example, information and research utilized to make policy recommendations often neglects the communities these policies most affect, thus failing to recognize the knowledge and resources already within localized communities, such as the innovative efforts to identify and encourage safer sex practices and to improve access to HIV treatment and education. Aggleton and Parker argue that honesty, a more nuanced understanding of sexual practices, and involvement in political activism are critical to the fight against HIV. MSM, men who have sex with transgender people, and other community members impacted by HIV, or involved in the advocacy of persons living with HIV, are a critical component to successfully address the epidemic and move beyond biomedicalization, while improving access and quality of care.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.