Published January, 2011
Quantifying Sexual Exposure to HIV Within an HIV-serodiscordant Relationship: Development of an Algorithm, Julie Fox et al., AIDS (2011)
This abstract is taken, in part, from the article summary.
The risk of acquiring HIV from a single sexual contact varies enormously, reflecting biological and behavioral characteristics of both infected and uninfected partners. This article systematically reviewed current literature on HIV transmission estimates, and developed an HIV risk score that would allow quantification of overall risk of HIV acquisition within HIV-serodiscordant partnerships. The HIV risk score enumerates the relative risk of HIV acquisition from HIV-positive partners incorporating the type and frequency of specific sex acts, the HIV plasma viral load and stage of disease, the presence of genital ulcer disease in either partner, and pregnancy, HSV-2 seropositivity, and circumcision status (men only) in the HIV-negative partner.
The authors conclude that key determinants of HIV exposure risk can be incorporated into a mathematical model in order to quantify individual relative risks of acquiring HIV. They intend for the model to facilitate comparisons within clinical trials of exposed uninfected individuals and facilitate interventions to reduce HIV transmission. In addition to providing valuable, if dense, data on the comparable risks of sexual HIV transmission, the article also gives a sense of the sheer volume of factors that influence transmission.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.